1973 BMW 2004 vs. 1953 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 1973 BMW 2004 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (217 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1973 BMW 2004. (97 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Jaguar C-Type should accelerate faster than 1973 BMW 2004. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 BMW 2004 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1953 Jaguar C-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 BMW 2004. (157 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1953 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 BMW 2004.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 BMW 2004 | 1953 Jaguar C-Type | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 2004 | C-Type |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3440 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2450 mm |
