1973 BMW 2004 vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1973 BMW 2004 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 BMW 2004 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1973 BMW 2004. (97 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1973 BMW 2004. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 BMW 2004 weights approximately 324 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 BMW 2004 | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | BMW | Lotus |
Model | 2004 | Elan |
Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 696 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2240 mm |