1973 BMW 2004 vs. 2006 Cadillac STS-V
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 BMW 2004. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 BMW 2004 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 343 more horse power than 1973 BMW 2004. (97 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1973 BMW 2004.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 427 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 BMW 2004. (157 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 BMW 2004.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 BMW 2004 | 2006 Cadillac STS-V | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 2004 | STS-V |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 440 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 584 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2960 mm |
