1973 BMW 2004 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 BMW 2004. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 BMW 2004 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1973 BMW 2004. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1973 BMW 2004.
Because 1973 BMW 2004 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 BMW 2004. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 BMW 2004. (157 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 BMW 2004.
Compare all specifications:
1973 BMW 2004 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 2004 | Epica |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 157 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |