1973 BMW 2004 vs. 2012 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2012 Toyota Tundra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 BMW 2004. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 BMW 2004 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Tundra (234 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1973 BMW 2004. (97 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1973 BMW 2004. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 310 kg more than 1973 BMW 2004. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Tundra (266 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 BMW 2004. (157 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 BMW 2004.

Compare all specifications:

1973 BMW 2004 2012 Toyota Tundra
Make BMW Toyota
Model 2004 Tundra
Year Released 1973 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 4000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 97 HP 234 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 157 Nm 266 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3800 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Weight 1020 kg 1330 kg
Vehicle Length 4420 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2610 mm