1973 BMW 3 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 BMW 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 BMW 3 would be higher. At 3,153 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 BMW 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 BMW 3 (203 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 BMW 3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 BMW 3 (287 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1973 BMW 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1973 BMW 3 | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 3 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3153 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 287 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2210 mm |