1973 BMW 3 vs. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 BMW 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 BMW 3 would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 BMW 3 (203 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 BMW 3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 320 kg more than 1973 BMW 3.
Because 1973 BMW 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 BMW 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 BMW 3 | 2000 Daewoo Arcadia | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | 3 | Arcadia |
Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3153 cc | 3206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4960 mm |