1973 BMW 3 vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 BMW 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 BMW 3 would be higher. At 3,153 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 BMW 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 BMW 3 (203 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 BMW 3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 28 kg more than 1973 BMW 3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 BMW 3 (287 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 1973 BMW 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1973 BMW 3 | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 3 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3153 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 287 Nm | 250 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |