1973 BMW 3 vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 BMW 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 BMW 3 would be higher. At 3,153 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 BMW 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 BMW 3 (203 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 BMW 3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1973 BMW 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 BMW 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 BMW 3 | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 3 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3153 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 203 HP | 109 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |