1973 BMW 3.3 vs. 2009 Ford E-250
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 BMW 3.3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 BMW 3.3 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1973 BMW 3.3. (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1973 BMW 3.3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 BMW 3.3 weights approximately 484 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 BMW 3.3. (289 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 BMW 3.3.
Compare all specifications:
1973 BMW 3.3 | 2009 Ford E-250 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 3.3 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3295 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 289 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 6030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 132 L |