1973 BMW Touring vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1973 BMW Touring is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1973 BMW Touring. (85 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1973 BMW Touring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1973 BMW Touring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 BMW Touring | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Touring | 62 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1573 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3300 mm |
