1973 Buick Skylark vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 5,724 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1973 Buick Skylark is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Buick Skylark. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 449 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Buick Skylark. (366 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Buick Skylark.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Buick Skylark | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | Skylark | HRT |
Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5724 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 366 Nm | 815 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |