1973 Buick Skylark vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 5,724 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1973 Buick Skylark. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1973 Buick Skylark.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Buick Skylark (366 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 1973 Buick Skylark will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Buick Skylark | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | Skylark | UTE |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5724 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 366 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |