1973 Cadillac Calais vs. 1960 Mazda R 360
To start off, 1973 Cadillac Calais is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1960 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1960 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1865 kg more than 1960 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Cadillac Calais | 1960 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Calais | R 360 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1960 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 355 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 2245 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 2990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 1770 mm |