1973 Cadillac Calais vs. 1966 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 1973 Cadillac Calais is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1966 Toyota Corolla. (58 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1966 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1545 kg more than 1966 Toyota Corolla. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Cadillac Calais | 1966 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Calais | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1076 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 58 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2245 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 3860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2290 mm |
