1973 Cadillac Calais vs. 1972 Volvo 140
To start off, 1973 Cadillac Calais is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1972 Volvo 140. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1972 Volvo 140. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 985 kg more than 1972 Volvo 140. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Cadillac Calais | 1972 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Calais | 140 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2245 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2610 mm |