1973 Cadillac Calais vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1986 Ford Aerostar is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Calais (208 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 835 kg more than 1986 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Cadillac Calais | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Calais | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 88 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2245 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3030 mm |
