1973 Cadillac Calais vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL (317 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1973 Cadillac Calais. (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1973 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 405 kg more than 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Cadillac Calais | 1996 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Calais | SL |
Year Released | 1973 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2245 kg | 1840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2520 mm |