1973 Cadillac Calais vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (301 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1973 Cadillac Calais. (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1973 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 585 kg more than 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Cadillac Calais | 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Calais | CLK |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2245 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2860 mm |
