1973 Cadillac Calais vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1973 Cadillac Calais. (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1973 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1322 kg more than 2002 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Cadillac Calais | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Calais | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2245 kg | 923 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 5530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3270 mm |
