1973 Cadillac Calais vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1973 Cadillac Calais. (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1973 Cadillac Calais. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 270 kg more than 1973 Cadillac Calais. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Cadillac Calais | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | Calais | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 4398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2245 kg | 2515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2890 mm |
