1973 Cadillac Calais vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (130 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1020 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Cadillac Calais | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | Calais | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1786 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2245 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2500 mm |
