1973 Cadillac Calais vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (167 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 882 kg more than 2010 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Cadillac Calais | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Calais | 3 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7734 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 167 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2245 kg | 1363 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4506 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2639 mm |
