1973 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1973 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1295 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Cadillac DeVille | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1973 | 1967 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2210 mm |