1973 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 141 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1973 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7734 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5880 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2490 mm |