1973 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 8,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado (223 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado (522 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1973 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Cadillac Eldorado | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | Eldorado | 2000 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8192 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.3 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2220 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 101 L | 64 L |