1973 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 225 kg more than 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Cadillac Eldorado | 1969 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Eldorado | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8190 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 5180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 3040 mm |
