1973 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1978 Volvo 260
To start off, 1978 Volvo 260 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 260. (146 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 975 kg more than 1978 Volvo 260. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Cadillac Eldorado | 1978 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Eldorado | 260 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8190 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2660 mm |
