1973 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado (223 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1415 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Cadillac Eldorado | 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Eldorado | Celeste |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8190 cc | 1410 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2350 mm |
