1973 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK (367 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. (223 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 897 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Cadillac Eldorado | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Eldorado | CLK |
Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8190 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 367 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1428 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2780 mm |