1973 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 980 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Cadillac Eldorado | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Eldorado | CU-X |
Year Released | 1973 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8190 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2680 mm |