1973 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 855 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Cadillac Eldorado | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | Eldorado | F1 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 8190 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2210 mm |