1973 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (229 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 20 kg more than 2009 Jeep Commander.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Cadillac Eldorado | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | Eldorado | Commander |
Year Released | 1973 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8190 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 2305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2790 mm |