1973 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1973 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 568 kg more than 2011 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2011 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Cadillac Eldorado | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | Eldorado | CTS |
Year Released | 1973 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8190 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5650 mm | 4859 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2880 mm |