1973 Chevrolet Aerovette vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 6,556 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Volvo 145 weights approximately 288 kg more than 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chevrolet Aerovette | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Aerovette | 145 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6556 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1002 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2620 mm |