1973 Chevrolet Aerovette vs. 2005 Volvo V50
To start off, 2005 Volvo V50 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette would be higher. At 6,556 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo V50 weights approximately 477 kg more than 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette.
Because 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chevrolet Aerovette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chevrolet Aerovette | 2005 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Aerovette | V50 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6556 cc | 2318 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1002 kg | 1479 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2800 mm |