1973 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chevrolet Camaro (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 377 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chevrolet Camaro (379 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1973 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Chevrolet Camaro | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Camaro | TS-50 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5735 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 379 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2760 mm |
