1973 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Mercury Mariner

To start off, 2006 Mercury Mariner is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 340 kg more than 1973 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 2006 Mercury Mariner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Mariner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chevrolet Camaro (379 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Mariner. (168 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1973 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Mariner.

Compare all specifications:

1973 Chevrolet Camaro 2006 Mercury Mariner
Make Chevrolet Mercury
Model Camaro Mariner
Year Released 1973 2006
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5735 cc 2299 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 0 HP
Torque 379 Nm 168 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.7 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.4 mm 94 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1585 kg 1925 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1260 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2630 mm