1973 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 134 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Because 1973 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chevrolet Camaro (379 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo C30. (350 Nm). This means 1973 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chevrolet Camaro | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Camaro | C30 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 379 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2639 mm |