1973 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1973 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chevrolet Impala (110 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1973 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chevrolet Impala | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Impala | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1973 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4097 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2490 mm |