1973 Chevrolet Vega vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chevrolet Vega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chevrolet Vega would be higher. At 2,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chevrolet Vega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1973 Chevrolet Vega. (81 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1973 Chevrolet Vega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 203 kg more than 1973 Chevrolet Vega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chevrolet Vega. (167 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chevrolet Vega.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chevrolet Vega | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Vega | TS-50 |
Year Released | 1973 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2287 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 132 L |