1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1952 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1973 Chrysler 160 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 15 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Because 1952 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler 160 (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 1952 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | 160 | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1973 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2040 mm |