1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1955 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1973 Chrysler 160 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Chrysler 160 | 1955 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 160 | 12 M |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2500 mm |
