1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1961 Fiat 850
To start off, 1973 Chrysler 160 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Fiat 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Fiat 850 would be higher. At 1,638 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1961 Fiat 850. (51 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1961 Fiat 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 452 kg more than 1961 Fiat 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler 160 (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Fiat 850. (69 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Fiat 850.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 1961 Fiat 850 | |
Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
Model | 160 | 850 |
Year Released | 1973 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1638 cc | 847 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2010 mm |