1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1964 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1973 Chrysler 160 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1964 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1964 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 1964 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 160 | Taunus |
Year Released | 1973 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2530 mm |