1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina
To start off, 1973 Chrysler 160 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina would be higher. At 1,812 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler 160 (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina. (145 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 1966 Ford Lotus Cortina | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 160 | Lotus Cortina |
Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |