1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1966 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1973 Chrysler 160 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,638 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1966 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 1966 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 160 | Taunus |
Year Released | 1973 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1638 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2530 mm |