1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1980 Triumph TR8
To start off, 1980 Triumph TR8 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,523 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Triumph TR8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Triumph TR8 (138 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1973 Chrysler 160. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Triumph TR8 should accelerate faster than 1973 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1980 Triumph TR8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Triumph TR8 (224 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 1980 Triumph TR8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1973 Chrysler 160 | 1980 Triumph TR8 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
| Model | 160 | TR8 |
| Year Released | 1973 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1638 cc | 3523 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2170 mm |
