1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1982 Ford Granada
To start off, 1982 Ford Granada is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Chrysler 160 (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1982 Ford Granada. (69 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1973 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Granada weights approximately 275 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Chrysler 160 (153 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Granada. (148 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1973 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 1982 Ford Granada | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 160 | Granada |
Year Released | 1973 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1095 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2780 mm |