1973 Chrysler 160 vs. 1982 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1982 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Reliant is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Plymouth Reliant weights approximately 85 kg more than 1973 Chrysler 160.
Because 1973 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1973 Chrysler 160 | 1982 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Chrysler | Plymouth |
Model | 160 | Reliant |
Year Released | 1973 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1638 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2260 mm |